BEGPAN9.CVP 931105 3.1 Scanners OK. You suspect you have a virus. You have made what preparations you can. Let us look at what to do in light of the different ways this problem has come to your attention. If you truly do have a virus, you probably have been alerted by a virus signature scanning program. Scanners, for all their faults, still account for the vast majority of virus infection alerts, as much as 90%, according to one study. Therefore, you probably even know the name of the virus. Thus, you may be in a position to call for help with that specific virus. But, be careful. This type of request is made all the time on the nets, and the answer is always the same. Which scanner did you test it with? Which version of the scanner do you have (and is it up to date)? Have you confirmed this with another scanner? The reason behind these questions is that all scanners do not use the same name for the same virus. In particular, some of the very popular commercial programs feel no need to correspond to anyone else. Therefore, the names they assign may be very arbitrary, and of no help to someone trying to help you. Furthermore, all scanners are subject to "false positive" results. This is when a virus signature used in the scanner matches a string in a non-infected file. Most viral scanning programs use signatures that are worked out independently and, therefore, they work slightly differently. Therefore, it is a good idea to check the results of one scanner against another, or even more. Also, it is a good idea to ensure that you have the latest version of any given scanner, so that any problems previously noted may have been ironed out. If you do a second test with an updated version of your scanner and it reports a different virus name, this is not unusual. Virus researchers, and scanner authors, have to give a virus *some* name when they receive it. They may later change the name when others are using a more suitable or standardized name. In summary: if you are using scanning software, have more than one scanner around. In fact, it might be a very good idea *not* to standardize on a single product. If you have a very large company, you might license three different antiviral programs, each for a third of your computers. If the various scanners are distributed throughout the company, it is almost as good as having all three on each machine, since infections tend to occur in geographic clumps. Keep your scanners up to date, and when an alarm is raised, check it out with other programs. copyright Robert M. Slade, 1993 BEGPAN9.CVP 931105 ============== Vancouver ROBERTS@decus.ca | "My son, beware ... of the Institute for Robert_Slade@sfu.ca | making of books there is Research into rslade@cue.bc.ca | no end, and much study is User p1@CyberStore.ca | a weariness of the flesh." Security Canada V7K 2G6 | Ecclesiastes 12:12