From mods@co-cure.org Tue Sep 21 20:25:48 2004 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:34:27 -0400 From: "Jill McLaughlin via Co-Cure Moderators" To: CO-CURE@LISTSERV.NODAK.EDU Subject: [CO-CURE] MED: Information on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (M.E.)/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) From Jill McLaughlin : The following was rejected by the NCF, but this information was completed and is accurate so thought it should be shared. People have been very eager to have information and to try to get as much out as possible. The continued interest in M.E. and moving toward the interim use of the term M.E./CFS, issues surrounding M.E. and CFS in terms of definition, differences and diagnosis are in need of explanation and clarification. And these are topics that have been discussed and that patients seem most concerned with in terms of importance or what has been lacking from other sources. Feel free to use or distribute. Jill McLaughlin ___________________ [permission to forward] Information on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (M.E.)/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) What is CFS? What is M.E.? The term Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) was introduced in 1988 to describe medically unexplained, persistent or relapsing fatigue of new onset. CFS has come to include what has historically been known as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (M.E.). CFS represents a broad diagnostic category and selects a heterogeneous (mixed) patient population, amalgamating disparate health problems that contain "fatigue" under the umbrella term CFS. Some patient groups adopted the term Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome (CFIDS) to differentiate it from idiopathic chronic fatigue. M.E. is a more specific and appropriate diagnosis than chronic fatigue syndrome, as it describes a specific condition with muscle and neurological symptoms, not only the ubiquitous symptom of fatigue. M.E. is a distinct clinical entity that can be clearly defined by observable physical signs and characteristic features (not merely by exclusion), the most distinctive being incapacitating exhaustion after even minimal exertion, and prolonged recovery time. More specifically, the fatigue in M.E. is exertion related (vs. "tired all the time"), with a significantly prolonged recovery time, and all symptoms can be exacerbated by levels of physical, cognitive, sensory or emotional stress that would have been of no consequence prior to the illness onset. M.E. is a systemic disease with many systemic features, but characterized primarily by central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction, of which fatigue, sleep disorders, autonomic dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction, endocrine dysfynction, proprioceptive dysfunction, sensory dysfunction etc. are among the many and varied manifestations. It is also characterized by what may be a marked variation and fluctuation of symptoms, both in occurrence and intensity. CFS and M.E. are currently classified in the WHO ICD-10 as a neurological disorder (G.93.3 - Diseases of the Nervous System - Other disorders of the brain and central nervous system). What's in a name? Terminology and usage is beyond preference or semantics, as it is impossible to write about any illness, particularly one so complex, without attempting to define and understand the various terms used to describe it. Currently both names/descriptions may be used, or sometimes may be used interchangeably, which has led to a great deal of confusion. Overall CFS/CFIDS is used in the U.S., while M.E. is still preferred by most of Europe, Canada and Australia. Dr. Charles Lapp, board member of the American Association of Chronic Fatigue syndrome (AACFS) and member of a federal HHS CFS advisory committee, states "One thing that we all seem to agree on is that the word "fatigue" needs to be removed from the name of the illness we call "chronic fatigue syndrome." Just tell somebody that you have chronic fatigue syndrome, and the first retort is, 'oh I have that too I'm just so tired.' The term "chronic fatigue," while descriptive of the most common symptom of this illness is so vague and banal that it seems derisive and derogatory. The "fatigue" of this illness is so much more than just "tiredness." In fact there is no word in the English lexicon that describes the lack of stamina, the paucity of energy, the absolute malaise and turpitude that accompanies this illness." One symptom should not be the name, especially one so non-specific and non-definable as fatigue, which is shared by nearly all illnesses both physical (neurologic, autoimmune, infectious, malignancies etc.) and psychiatric, as well as being a normal physiological state; nor should fatigue be the defining feature, nor the basis for researching the illness. It is impossible to convey the seriousness of an illness whose name merely denotes 'tiredness.' The prominent association of fatigue with psychiatric disorders has greatly contributed to the erroneous psychological attributions of the illness, much to the detriment of patients. This has led to the trivialization of the illness as little more than a manageable, unexplained fatigue state (rather than the prominent more specific - and debilitating - neurological features of M.E), and the misperception that it may be treatable by little more than counseling, OTC medications, antidepressants and lifestyle changes. Until the name/definition issues are resolved, a general worldwide consensus has been the interim adoption of the term M.E./CFS (to specify what some have recognized and referred to more specifically as "strictly defined CFS" - which is what prior to 1988 was recognized as M.E.) M.E./CFS is a serious, complex illness with numerous systemic features. Based on clinical and scientific evidence, CFS/M.E. may be characterized as a CNS dysfunction, which offers the most plausible explanation for the diverse physical and neuropsychiatric symptoms, of which fatigue, NMH, sleep disorders, etc. are among the many and varied manifestations. History M.E. has been documented in the medical literature since 1934 in both epidemic and sporadic forms and has been formally classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a neurological disorder since 1969. There have been many recorded outbreaks of M.E. during the 20th century, which in the U.S. were initially referred to epidemic neuromyaesthenia. In 1959 a comprehensive review paper was published by Dr. Donald Henderson (a CDC epidemiologist) and Dr. Alexis Shelakov (an NIH epidemiologist) in the New England Journal of Medicine describing several outbreaks. Dr. Henderson noted: "The pattern of the epidemic, the absence of any common exposure factors and the high incidence among medical and hospital personnel were consistent only with an infectious disease transmitted from person to person. In 1988, what was historically known both as myalgic encephalomyelitis (M.E.) and as the well-documented epidemic neuromyasthenia was renamed ³Chronic Fatigue Syndrome² by a panel convened under the aegis of the CDC. CFS was redefined in 1994 and now has become a broad diagnostic category and covers nearly anything with profound, chronic, unexplained fatigue. Little epidemiology has been done since, as it is not feasible to confirm clusters of fatigue. How is CFS diagnosed Currently the diagnosis is based on an international research case definition (Fukuda, 1994). CFS can be diagnosed if the patient meets the following criteria with no alternative medical or psychiatric explanation: 1.) Clinically evaluated, unexplained persistent or relapsing chronic fatigue that is of new or definite onset, is not the result of ongoing exertion, is not substantially alleviated by rest and results in a substantial reduction in previous levels of functioning. 2.) The concurrent occurrence of four or more of the following symptoms: substantial impairment of short-term memory or concentration, sore throat, tender lymph nodes, muscle pain, multi-joint pain without redness or swelling, headaches of a new type, pattern or severity, unrefreshing sleep, post exertional malaise lasting more than 24 hours. These symptoms must have persisted or recurred during six or more months of illness and must not have predated the fatigue. The CFS (Fukuda) definition was developed for research purposes and has been proven inadequate for clinical purposes. The ever broadening definition of CFS selects a mixed patient population, with the tendency to include people with mild disability. The focus on fatigue and the vagueness of the definition makes it difficult to distinguish the pathological fatigue of CFS/M.E. from ordinary fatigue or other fatiguing conditions. Patients may fulfill the loose CFS criteria who have "fatiguing" disorders other than M.E. and may include those with fatigue due to primary sleep disorders, nutritional deficiencies, stress and a number of psychiatric conditions. And with the existence of different definitions of CFS, it has thus come to mean different things to different people. It is the use of increasingly wider, less specific criteria and the focus on fatigue has created much confusion and misunderstanding during the past decade. Recently an international panel of experts, under the auspices of HealthCanada, developed a Clinical Consensus Definition (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Clinical Working Case Definition, Diagnostic and Treatment Protocols, Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Vol. 11 (1) 2003.) This definition is far superior to the various other CFS definitions and has been welcomed internationally. It includes the hallmark features of M.E. (optional in the CFS definition) and neurological and cardiovascular symptoms which more accurately represent the true symptomatology and manifestations of the illness than other current (fatigue based) definitions. This represents the current best practice guidelines for treating and managing M.E./CFS. Other symptoms/characteristics Symptoms also frequently include pain, vertigo (dizziness), visual disturbances, photophobia, spacial disorientation, disequilibrium, nausea, paresthesias (numbness and tingling), dyspnea, emotional lability (mood swings), tachycardia, sleep disorders (hypersomnia or insomnia), low grade fever, intolerance to alcohol, seizure activity. Fragmented sleep (periods of wakefulness throughout the sleep period) and lack of deep-stage sleep are very common. True insomnia (inability to fall asleep) is uncommon, although patients may have delayed sleep onset because of a disrupted circadian rhythm (resulting in reversal of nighttime sleep pattern). Neurocognitive dysfunction may include cognitive, motor and perceptual disturbances. The cognitive dysfunction may be more variable but may be pronounced, and is sometimes referred to as "brain fog," or confusion. It also includes slow information processing speed, trouble with speaking, writing, reading and short term memory. There may be an "overload phenomenon," where patients may be very sensitive to light, sounds, odor. The variable sensory, cognitive, emotional or motor overload may precipitate a "crash," where the patient experiences a severe, incapacitating physical/mental fatigue or weakness. Similar Medical Conditions M.E./CFS is similar to other illnesses such as multiple sclerosis, lupus, Lyme disease, mononucleosis, Gulf War Syndrome. CFS may overlap or co-exist with fibromyalgia, multiple chemical sensitivities, irritable bowel syndrome. However, these may co-exist with other conditions as well and are viewed as separate entities which stand on their own, regardless of whether a person has other medical problems. Even though there are similarities or overlap does not mean that they represent the same etiological or pathobiological process. Psychiatric Conditions Although some symptoms may be similar, M.E./CFS is not a psychiatric illness. There are several objective findings that differentiate CFS/M.E. from psychiatric conditions and indicate that it is biologically, not psychologically determined. According to Harvard University professor Dr. Anthony Komaroff: "In summary, there is now considerable evidence of an underlying biological process in most patients (which) is inconsistent with the hypothesis that (the illness) involves symptoms that are only imagined or amplified because of underlying psychiatric distress. It is time to put that hypothesis to rest." The prevalence rates of clinically significant depression in patients with CFS are not much different from those reported in other medically ill populations. Abnormalities associated with CFS/M.E. SPECT scans have demonstrated decreased cerebral blood flow, PET scans have shown decreased brain metabolism; MRI scans have shown the presence of small white matter lesions. These abnormalities have been shown to correlate with clinical status. The abnormalities in M.E./CFS patients most closely resemble those seen in AIDS encephalopathy. Neuroendocrine abnormalities have been found in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Hypothalamic dysfunction causes decreased cortisol; thus patients react extremely adversely to stress. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction includes orthostatic intolerance, neurally-mediated hypotension and postural tachycardia syndrome. Many patients have low blood volume. The immune system abnormalities mimic the immune pattern seen in viral infections. Specific findings include increased numbers of activated cytotoxic T cells, low natural killer cell function, and elevated immune complexes. A large University of Miami study found that the array of immunological defects suggest that M.E./CFS is a form of acquired immunodefficiency. A more specific immune system abnormality has been discovered in M.E./CFS of increased activity and dysfunction of the 2-5A RNase-L antiviral pathway in lymphocytes. The dysregulation of the RNase-L pathway supports the hypothesis that viral infection may play a role in the pathogenesis of the illness. Patients with CFS/M.E. were very different from patients with major depression, fibromyalgia or healthy controls. Sub-optimal cardiac function and abnormal cardiovascular responses have also been demonstrated. One study found found left-ventricular dysfunction following exertion and orthostatic stress in patients with M.E./CFS and that the heart failed to pump enough blood following exertion and upright posture. Dr. A. Martin Lerner discovered persistent viral infection in the heart, causing left-ventricular dysfunction, resulting in exercise intolerance.(Exercise, in turn, worsens the cardiac dysfunction.) The disease in the early stages is consistent with a dilated cardiomyopathy that in later stages might result in progressive, end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy, a type of heart failure. Abnormal laboratory values do occur among M.E./CFS patients. These may include: Immune complexes, Immunoglobulin G, low level Antinuclear antibody titer, Alkaline phosphatase, Cholesterol, Lactate dehydrogenase, Atypical lymphocyte count. These tests may support a diagnosis of M.E./CFS although they lack sufficient sensitivity to be considered diagnostic tests, but can be used as objective markers of illness to support disability claims. More recently, the University of Hawaii discovered the ocurrence of an endogenous lipid, similar in structure to ciguatoxin, in M.E./CFS. The chronic phase lipids (CLP) may be comparable to "acute phase proteins" such as C-reative protein, which increase in diseases such as inflammation and trauma. The test for CPL may be used to confirm the diagnosis. The testing procedure is on the NCF website at http://www.ncf-net.org/ Infectious Agents That fatigue occurs in infectious illnesses has been well established. Many patients suffer from sore throats, fever, tender lymph nodes, which accompany diseases caused by infectious agents. Several retrospective studies have shown that infectious agents play an important role in the onset and maintenance of M.E./CFS. The role of infections remain unclear as to whether they may be causative, co-factor or opportunistic. M.E./CFS has been associated with several infectious agents including Mycoplasma, Rickettsia, Chlamydia, Borrelia. Several viruses have been associated with M.E./CFS, including: herpes virus, particularly human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6),Epstein-Barr virus (which causes infectious mononucleosis), Cytomegalovirus and Coxsackie viruses. Indirect immunological evidence also supports the role of persistent viral infection. These infections have been found to play an important role in M.E./CFS and antimicrobial therapy to suppress chronic infections has resulted in improvement. Whether or not they are causal, these agents may contribute to the morbidity and warrant appropriate testing and treatment. What causes M.E./CFS The precise cause is unknown but published studies continue to demonstrate that the basis lies in abnormalities of the central nervous system (CNS) and immune system, both of which influence and alter the function of the other. A large study of the original Incline Village outbreak in the early 1980's reported that M.E./CFS represents "an immunologically mediated inflammatory process of the CNS." Due to its similarity to chronic mononucleosis, CFS was initially thought to be caused by a virus infection, most probably Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). However EBV activation (along with reactivation of other latent viruses) is now considered a consequence rather than the cause. Based on physical and clinical evidence, many experts believe that viruses are associated with M.E./CFS and may be involved in causing the illness. There is evidence from several controlled studies of the reactivation of several chronic viral infections in M.E./CFS. M.E./CFS has been documented following a variety of acute infections with viruses (such as following acute infectious mononucleosis), bacteria (such as following properly-treated Lyme disease), and other microbial infections (such as following Q fever). Dr. Anthony Komaroff, international M.E./CFS expert and Harvard researcher, notes the relationship between the CNS abnormalities and infection, for which there is considerable evidence. The article published in the Journal of Internal Medicine states: "one interesting hypothesis that links infection with CNS dysfunction is the possibility of a chronic viral encephalitis as an initiator of a process that leads to CFS. It is known that viruses in animals and humans can affect the HPA axis, thus making infectious agents that cause CNS disturbances of particular interest." CFS research is conducted at CDC by the Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases. Is CFS/M.E. contagious Thorough transmissibility studies have not been conducted. CFS/M.E. has been reported in multiple family members. Some studies have shown genetic linkages, however, genetic basis is not consistent with the epidemiology of M.E./CFS Genetic diseases slowly increase in the population over time, not as a sudden explosion of cases, as happened with M.E./CFS in the early-mid 1980's. There have been numerous outbreaks of M.E. worldwide. A large epidemiological investigation was conducted on a 1956 outbreak in Punta Gorda, Florida by Chief of CDC's Epidemic Intelligence Service Dr. D.A. Henderson (who is revered for spearheading the successful effort to eliminate smallpox). According to Dr. Henderson, "The pattern of the epidemic, the apparent absence of any common exposure factors and the high incidence of illness among medical and hospital personnel were consistent only with an infectious disease transmitted from person to person... We were able to postulate the general nature of the micro-organism. It was probably a virus." According to the Red Cross, patients with autoimmune disease, including systemic lupus erythematosus and multiple sclerosis, are not eligible to donate blood. Chronic fatigue syndrome appears under chronic illnesses. Most chronic illnesses are acceptable as long as you feel well. Chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's Disease are not specific disqualifications. A CDC official advised an inquiring M.E./CFS patient to refrain from donating blood or organs until the cause or mode of transmission is better understood. It has been shown that patients may harbor infectious agents in their blood. Blood donation may also exacerbate symptoms due to low blood volume. Prevalence and risk factors Recent data has established the importance of M.E./CFS as a serious public health concern. A Chicago study estimated that 800,000 adults in the U.S. have CFS/M.E. More importantly, 90% have never been appropriately diagnosed. This is a public health crisis. Initial research suggested that M.E./CFS was a relatively rare disorder and affected mainly upper middle class white women. For some time there were even disputes in medical circles about whether M.E./CFS existed or if it was a "real" illness, even though it is formally recognized by the CDC, NIH, SSA, WHO. It was initially disparagingly dubbed "Yuppie flu," giving the impression that it affected mainly overachievers who couldn't handle stress and burned out, which hardly seemed to warrant much attention or concern. M.E./CFS is not limited to any specific race, age or socioeconomic group. Contrary to the "yuppie flu" myth, this study also showed the illness to be wide-spread in low-income and minority communities. It is most common minorities, with Latinos and Mexican Americans exhibiting higher rates than Caucasians. Onset and prognosis The clinical course of M.E./CFS varies considerably. There is a full spectrum of disease severity, with some patients being mildly affected while others are in wheelchairs or completely bedridden. The clinical outcome of M.E./CFS usually takes one of three courses: recovery/improvement, relapsing/remitting course, and permanent incapacity or progressive deterioration of symptoms. Studies have shown that recovery is uncommon, with only 4% of patients recovering and 39% showing some symptom improvement after four years. Those who obtain an early diagnosis, and receive appropriate care and management, tend to be the ones who make the most significant progress. Australian researchers found that M.E./CFS patients had more dysfunction than those with M.S., that the degree of impairment was more severe than in end stage renal and heart disease, and that only in terminally ill cancer and stroke patients was the sickness impact profile (SIP) higher than in M.E./CFS. Twenty five percent of the severely affected are home or bed-bound, many are unable to manage a visit to the doctor's office and thus are often unable to receive any medical care or services. Many are abandoned by the medical community, their family and friends and society in general, become isolated and remain ignored and invisible. Dr. Paul Cheney stated before an FDA Scientific Advisory Committee: "The worst cases have both an MS-like and an AIDS-like clinical appearance. The most difficult thing to treat is the severe pain. Most have abnormal neurological examination. 80% of cases are unable to work or attend school. We admit regularly to hospital with an inability to care for self." Suicide rates are high and seem to be related to the current climate of disbelief and rejection and inability to receive adequate support and services. The National CFIDS foundation has a Memorial list of M.E./CFS patients who have died, most recognizable causes being cancer and heart disease (a paper is under review). After decades of illness, death is known to occur from end organ damage. Treatment Treatment has been palliative at best, based on trial and error application of anecdotal evidence and has been mostly limited to the relieve of specific symptoms. This has been largely inadequate. M.E./CFS patients may be extremely sensitive to many medications, so only low doses should be given initially and still may produce intolerable side effects. The testing and recognition of underlying abnormalities offers the most effective treatment. For example, treating hypothalamic dysfunction which produces poor sleep, low hormone levels, and treating the effects of immune dysfunction/chronic infections (immune modulation to shift from Th2 to Th1 predominance, enhance NK cell activity, reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines, antivirals to reduce viral reactivation etc.) have proven the most successful. There are currently no FDA-approved medications for use in treating M.E./CFS. There are, however, a number of medications that may be helpful, even though some are recommended for effects that may be unrelated to their primary use. These include antifungals, antihistamines, antivirals, antibiotics, CNS depressants (or stimulants), immunoglobulins, cardiac medications, anti-inflammatories, anticonvulsants, expectorants and antidepressants. Vaccine Recommendations M.E./CFS patients should generally not be offered live vaccines because of risk of relapse. Flu vaccinations are generally not recommended to persons with M.E./CFS unless patients have tolerated them well in the past or have other medical complications in addition to M.E./CFS. Flu vaccines may cause serious relapses, and many patients fail to sero-convert (develop antibodies) to the vaccination. Thus, patients may have side effects in addition to a relapse of symptoms, but may not even develop immunity. Since smallpox vaccine is a live vaccinia virus, many experts recommend that persons with M.E./CFS not take smallpox vaccine, due to high incidence of immune dysfunction, autoimmune phenomenon, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Economic burden M.E./CFS costs the U.S. more than $9 billion each year in lost productivity, or about $20,000 per person annually, not even including healthcare costs, according to a CDC study published in the journal Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. About a quarter of those with chronic fatigue syndrome, or CFS/M.E., aren't able to work at all, and those who do continue to work lose about one-third of their income, the report said. M.E./CFS and Children Few pediatric studies have been done, yet is is well established that children and adolescents get M.E./CFS Minimal attention has been paid to critical features of M.E./CFS in children and is thus often unrecognized in children. Children with M.E./CFS are frequently dismissed as depressed or school phobic, and thus remain unable to receive proper care or accommodations for their illness. The effects can be devastating in children, resulting in serious disruption of their education and social development. Research conducted in the UK on a large school population showed that 51% of all children on long term sickness absence had M.E./CFS, overturning the myth that it is extremely rare in children. A national report done by the UK Department of Health, clearly states that all children who are moderate-severely affected will require home tutoring or distance learning and should not be expected to attend school, which can cause severe relapses. CBT CBT is a form of psychotherapy focused primarily on changing the way we think in order to reduce the understandable feelings of fear, depression and anxiety associated with chronic illnesses. CBT has often been misrepresented, claiming that it is an effective treatment for the condition as a whole - which goes way beyond the evidence. In terms of scientific evidence, the CBT trials have generally not included measures of symptoms other than fatigue and emotional distress. These trials have little relationship to patients with organic immunological and neurological abnormalities. While there may be improvement in fatigue or emotional distress, it does not improve overall activity or physical functioning. The complexity of CBT studies, their varied inclusion and exclusion criteria, issues of proper blinding, and the subjective means used for most evaluations seriously questions the validity of their results. The literature is replete with psychiatric studies on CFS (fatigue states) that have no bearing o M.E./CFS. It is not possible to effectively treat any neurological condition by using passive forms of psychological counseling. The exercise question According to the seminal work on M.E. of Dr. Melvin Ramsay, "The degree of physical incapacity varies greatly, but the dominant clinical feature of profound fatigue is directly related the length of time the patient persists in physical effort after its onset; put in another way, those patients who are given a period of enforced rest from the onset have the best prognosis." It has been demonstrated that graded exercise was either of little or no use to the majority of patients, and that the use graded exercise on the severely affected was indeed harmful. In a British study, 1,214 of 2,338 patients had tried graded exercise. Of these, 417 found it to be helpful, 197 reported no change and 610 (50%) indicated that it made their condition worse. This was the highest negative rating of any of the pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions covered in the questionnaire (and may explain the high drop out rates found in some of these programs). Exercise has been shown not to be an effective form of treatment, while it has also been confirmed that there may be ongoing neurological, endocrine, immunological, and cardiovascular abnormalities which are causing the symptoms of M.E./CFS. Exercise will not treat or improve these abnormalities and in fact, will exacerbate symptoms that are caused by such abnormalities. (Dr. A. Martin Lerner discovered that some patients had persistent viral infections in the heart, causing left-ventricular dysfunction, resulting in exercise intolerance. Exercise worsens the cardiac dysfunction.) Even minor activity, either physical or mental, may cause a significant worsening of symptoms. The recommended management for M.E./CFS is not exercise but "activity" management (sometimes referred to as pacing), which is to conserve energy, not to expend it. These are very different concepts, and pacing is intended to prevent overexertion and relapse, not for improvement. On average, M.E./CFS patients have been shown to be functioning dangerously close to their energy limits, and increasing activity is counter-productive. If even trivial activity can exacerbate symptoms, then exercise is not an effective treatment. Jill McLaughlin References Dowsett, E. G., Ramsay, A. M., McCartney, R. A., & Bell E. J. (1990). Myalgic Encephalomyelitis - a persistent enteroviral infection? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 66, 526-530. Ramsay, M. (1988). Myalgic encephalomyelitis and postviral fatigue states: The sage of Royal Free disease. 2nd edition. Gower Medical Publishing, London. Carruthers, B.M., Jain, A.K., DeMeirleir, K.L., Peterson, D.L., Klimas, N.G., Lerner, A.M., Bested, A.C., Flor-Henry, P., Joshi, P., Powles, A.C.P., Sherkey, J.A., & van de Sande, M.I. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: Clinical working case definition, diagnostic and treatments protocols. Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Poskanzer D.C., Henderson D.A., et al. Epidemic Neuromyasthenia: Outbreak in Punta Gorda, Florida. NEMJ 1959; 257:356-364. Henderson, D.A., Shelakov A. Epidemic Neuromyasthenia - clinical syndrome. NEJM 1959; 15:757-764. Acheson E.D. The clinical syndrome variously called "benign Myalgic Encephalomyelitis," "Iceland Disease," and "Epidemic Neuromyasthena." Am J Med 1959; 26:569. Schwartz R.B. Garada B.M. et el. Detection of intracranial anormalities in patients with CFS: comparison or MR imaging and SPECT. Am J Roentgenol 1994 April 162 (4): 935-941. Hokama Y., Uto G.A., Palafox NA, Chronic phase lipids in sera of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), chronic ciguatera fish poisoning (CCFP), hepatitis B, and cancer with antigenic epitope resembling ciguatoxin, as assessed with MAb-CTX J Clin Lab Anal. 2003;17(4):132-9. Lerner, A.M."Editorial Response: Microbial Persistence and Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy." Clinical Infectious Diseases (1999):29:526-7. Lerner, A. M., Goldstein, J., O'Neill W., et al."Cardiac involvement in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome as documented with Holter and biopsy data in Birmingham, Michigan, 1991-1993." Inf Dis in Clin Pract, 1997; 6:327-333. Jason, L.A., Holbert, C., Torres-Harding, S., & Taylor, R.R. Stigma and chronic fatigue syndrome: Surveying a name change. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Jason, L.A., Eisele, H., & Taylor, R.R. (2001). Assessing attitudes toward new names for chronic fatigue syndrome. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 24, 424-435. Jason, L.A., Taylor, R.R., Stepanek, Z., & Plioplys, S. (2001). Attitudes regarding chronic fatigue syndrome: The importance of a name. Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 61-71. Komaroff A.L., Buchwald D. Symptoms and signs of chronic fatigue syndrome. Rev Infect Dis1991;13(Suppl 1):S8-11 Jason, L.A., Taylor, R.R., Kennedy, C.L., Jordan, K., Song, S., Johnson, D., & Torres, S. (2000). Chronic fatigue syndrome: Sociodemographic subtypes in a community-based sample. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 23, 243-263. Tan, E.M., Sugiura, K., & Gupta, S. (2002). The case definition of chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Clinical Immunology, 22, 8-12. Epidemiological study of an epidemic diagnosed as poliomyelitis occurring among the personnel of Los Angeles County General Hospital during the summer of 1934. Gilliam AG. Public Health Bulletin, US Treasury Department No.240, 1938 Haley, R.W., Kurt, T.L., & Hom, J. (1997). Is there a Gulf War Syndrome? Journal of the American Medical Association, 277 (3), 215-222. Buchwald D., Cheney P.R., Peterson D.L. et. al. A chronic illness charcterized by fatigue, neurological and immunological disorders and active human herpes virus 6infection. Ann of Intern Med 1992; 116 (2): 103-113. Klimas, N. et.al. Immunological Abnormalities in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Clinical microbiology, June 1990:1403-1410. Suhadolnik R.S., Reichenbach N.I., et. al., Changes in the 2-5 A synthetase/RNase-L antiviral defense pathway in CFS. JCFS 1999;5(2?4): 223-242. DeMeirleir, K. DeBecker P. et al., Abstract. Presented at the Sydney Australia CFS conference 1999. Peckerman A., LaManca J.J., Dahl K.A., Chemitiganti R., Qureishi B., Natelson B.H. "Abnormal impedance cardiography predicts symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome." Am J Med Sci. 2003 Aug;326(2):55-60. Arnold Peckerman, PhD, John J. LaManca, PhD, Bushra Qureishi, MD, Kristina A. Dahl, MD, Roseli Golfetti, PhD, Yoshiharu Yamamoto, PhD and Benjamin H. Natelson, "Baroreceptor Reflex and Integrative Stress Responses in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome." Psychosomatic Medicine 65:889-895 (2003) Fukuda K., Straus S.E. et.al. CFS: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121:953-959. Dowsett E.G., Colby J. Long Term sickness absence due to CFS/M.WE. in UK schools: an epidemiological study with medical and educational imlications. JCFS 1997; 3(2):29-42. Scheweitzer R., Kelly B et.al., Quality of Life in CFS. Psychosom Med 1996; 58:50-57. Streeton, H.P., Thomas d., Bell D.S., The role of orthostatic hypotension, orthostatic tachycardia and subnormal erythrocyte volume in the pathogenesis of CFS. Am J Med Sci 2000 July; 30(1) 1-8. Lange G., Wang S. Neuroimaging in CFS. Am J Med 1998;105(3A;50S-53S. Hyde B.M., Bastien s.. The Clinical and Scientific Sasis of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Then Nightengale Research Foundation, Ottawa, Canada. Sandman C.A., Barron J.L., et. al. Memory deficits associated with CFS. Biol Psychiat 1993; 33:618-638. Patarca-Montero R., Mark T., et.al. The immunology of chronic fatigue syndrome. JCFS 2000; 6(3/4):69-107. Sources also include web site information and articles by Dr. Ellen Goudsmit, Dr. Derek Enlander, Dr. Jacob Teitelbaum, Dr. Byron Hyde, Dr. Maryann Spurgin, Dr. Betty Dowsett, Dr. Charles Lapp. ----------- --------------------------------------------- Nonpartisan ME/CFS Petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/CFS2004/ Send posts to mailto:CO-CURE@listserv.nodak.edu Join or leave the list at http://www.co-cure.org/sub.htm Select list topic options at http://www.co-cure.org/topics.htm Co-Cure Archives: http://listserv.nodak.edu/archives/co-cure.html ---------------------------------------------